05
Make Britain One of the Most Competitive Major Economies
Keep Corporation Tax broadly stable first — then reduce it progressively where growth and the public finances permit.
A deliberately staged approach to Corporation Tax: broadly stable while the new economic settlement is established, then progressively reduced where growth and the public finances permit, as one part of a wider pro-investment programme.
Published Manifesto 1.0 policy. The sections below set out the proposal as published. Questions and challenges are open questions, not settled answers.
Key figures
- Initial approach
- Remain broadly stable
- Future direction
- Progressive reductions
- Only where growth and the public finances permit.
- Fixed future rate
- None specified
- Deliberately unspecified.
- Fiscal principle
- Do not spend growth dividends before they exist.
01 · The Idea
Proposal 05 sets out a staged approach in three parts. Initially, Corporation Tax remains broadly stable while the new economic settlement is established.
Thereafter, progressive reductions may be considered where growth and the public finances permit. The long-term objective is an internationally competitive Corporation Tax environment.
The objective is not simply to advertise a lower headline rate. It is to create an internationally competitive environment for investment, enterprise and high-value economic activity while retaining fiscal discipline.
02 · How it works
Capital, companies and skilled people can choose where to locate. Britain competes with other major economies for factories, headquarters, laboratories, technology businesses, financial activity, research, high-value employment and long-term investment.
Corporation Tax is only one component of investment decisions, so it is not presented as a standalone solution. A competitive tax system cannot compensate for weak infrastructure, expensive energy, skills shortages or poor productivity.
A company retaining more post-tax profit might choose to invest in equipment, expand premises, recruit staff, increase R&D, build reserves, repay debt or return money to shareholders. Government cannot guarantee which choice an individual company will make, and no claim is made that every pound of reduction becomes productive investment.
The fiscal challenge is explicit. All else being equal, lowering Corporation Tax reduces the amount collected from a given amount of taxable profit. The economic case rests on the possibility that a more competitive environment may attract investment, expand profitable activity and increase the tax base — effects that are uncertain and require detailed modelling.
| Stage | Corporation Tax position |
|---|---|
| Initial position | Broadly stable while the settlement is established |
| Thereafter | Progressive reductions where growth and finances permit |
| Long-term objective | An internationally competitive environment |
Manifesto 1.0 does not propose an immediate Corporation Tax cut and does not specify a future rate. The sequencing is deliberate: it avoids promising a tax reduction before fiscal room exists to pay for it.
Priority areas for investment and expansion
- Manufacturing
- Technology
- Financial services
- Life sciences
- Artificial intelligence
- Defence
- Energy
- Engineering
- Advanced materials
- Nuclear
- Robotics
- Research-intensive industries
Britain also competes on factors beyond tax
- Skills
- Infrastructure
- Energy costs
- Regulation
- Political stability
- Access to finance
- Market size
03 · Why it is being proposed
The intended proposition is that Britain should become an attractive place to build, employ, innovate, invest and remain for the long term.
Corporation Tax is therefore treated as one component of a broader pro-investment programme rather than as the whole of it.
Future reductions are conditional for that reason. If the fiscal space does not emerge, reductions should not proceed simply because they were previously proposed.
What this proposal does not say
- This is not a promise of an immediate Corporation Tax cut.
- It does not specify a fixed future Corporation Tax rate.
- It does not guarantee that lower rates will generate enough growth to replace every pound of foregone revenue.
- It does not suggest Corporation Tax alone determines business investment.
- Implementation would require detailed HM Treasury and HMRC modelling.
04 · Questions & Challenges
Nothing in Manifesto 1.0 is presented as settled fact. These are open questions the proposal must be able to answer — they are not answered here.
- 01How much does Corporation Tax actually influence investment and location decisions compared with infrastructure, skills, energy and regulation?
- 02What evidence should determine when the public finances genuinely permit a reduction?
- 03Which sectors are most responsive to changes in Corporation Tax?
- 04How should Britain balance international tax competitiveness against the need to fund public services?
- 05What behavioural effects, including profit-shifting, would need to be modelled before reducing the rate?
- 06How should the success or failure of a Corporation Tax reduction be measured — investment, productivity, employment, tax receipts, company formation or a combination of these?
Have Your Say
What is your view on this proposal?
Scrutiny, not endorsement. Disagreement is as useful here as support.
Responses are counted anonymously and the running totals are shown publicly beside each option. One response per device, changeable at any time.
Have an objection, question or better alternative?
Set out your argument. Serious challenges shape later versions of the manifesto.